$11,000 Fine, Arrest Possible For Some Who Refuse Airport Scans And Pat-Downs

From The Palm Beach (Florida) Sun-Sentinel and Vision to America:

$11,000 fine, arrest possible for some who refuse airport scans and pat downs


8868

Share 23diggsdigg

Related

TSA alters airport pat-downs for kids after parents complain

US insists full-body airport scanners are safe, saying machines give off minuscule radiation

Possible body scan protest could clog airport checkpoints

Photos

10 ways to make flying less painful

These items won't fly

Air travel: Pack light and save money

See more photos »

X Simple precautions to help travelers stay healthy Stories

Travel blog: Get the latest travel tips, trends and deals

Flights: Check Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport flight status

Check your flight times: Miami International Airport flight information

See more stories »

XCheck Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport departures

How to pick the best airline: What you need to know

Graphic: How body scanning machines work

Air travelers to be hit with $10 baggage surcharges for winter holiday travel

Avoid these scams and hold on to your bags

Web sites help navigate the unfriendly skies

Preparation is essential to arriving on time

Chart: 20 busiest U.S. airports and their alternatives

Hidden taxes, surcharges creep up on unwary travelers

A little know-how combats jet lag

Conquer the fear of flying

Avoid last-minute fare markups

Packing for a business trip

Making the most of getting bumped

Airlines pledge improved data on delayed flights

The essentials of packing

The rewards of free time on the road

A strategy for getting around

Bigger planes, fewer flights address delays

Hotel rate quotes abroad can be deceiving

Chart: Flying the last-minute alternatives

Airport renovations add to passenger woes Topics

Transportation Security Administration

Tourism and Leisure Industry

Miami (Miami-Dade, Florida)

See more topics »

XHolidays

American Civil Liberties Union

Thanksgiving

Travel

Crimes

Transportation

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Miami Beach

John Ensign

Fort Lauderdale

Hollywood (Broward, Florida) By John Lantigua



Palm Beach Post



8:59 a.m. EST, November 20, 2010

E-mail Print Share Text Size sfl-airport-scans-pat-downs-refual-20101121

If you don't want to pass through an airport scanner that allows security agents to see an image of your naked body or to undergo the alternative, a thorough manual search, you may have to find another way to travel this holiday season.



The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is warning that any would-be commercial airline passenger who enters an airport checkpoint and then refuses to undergo the method of inspection designated by TSA will not be allowed to fly and also will not be permitted to simply leave the airport.



That person will have to remain on the premises to be questioned by the TSA and possibly by local law enforcement. Anyone refusing faces fines up to $11,000 and possible arrest.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Click to get the latest Business headlines sent to your phone

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





"Once a person submits to the screening process, they can not just decide to leave that process," says Sari Koshetz, regional TSA spokesperson, based in Miami.



Koshetz said such passengers would be questioned "until it is determined that they don't pose a threat" to the public.



Palm Beach Sheriff's Office spokesperson Teri Barbera said PBSO deputies stationed at the airport would become involved when requested by the TSA.



"We will handle each incident on a case-by-case basis," she said.



No one will be forcibly searched or arrested "just because they refuse to go through the security procedures," Barbera said. "That may rise to the level of suspicious behavior for the TSA, but it wouldn't rise to the level of suspicious behavior for a deputy," she said.



But Barbera said that if a person is judged to be a possible threat, deputies are legally permitted to detain and search that individual. "The deputies will do it at the airport just as they would do it anywhere else," she said.



Once cleared by the TSA and deputies, the people will be allowed to leave, she said.



Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union was urging Americans to petition the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the TSA, to change the new policies.



"All of us have a right to travel without such crude invasions of our privacy," the ACLU said in a statement. "Tell DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano to put in place security measures that respect passengers' privacy rights. You shouldn't have to check your rights when you check your luggage."



The ACLU outlined ways for citizens to respond to TSA demands at checkpoints and also provided a form letter for filing complaints.



But the TSA stuck to its guns. Testifying before Congress Wednesday, TSA Administrator John S. Pistole said inspectors at the nation's airports would enforce the new policies despite complaints that the search methods are too invasive.



"We have to ensure that each person getting on every flight is secure," Pistole said.



Asked by U.S. Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) about groups that objected to all forms of bodily search on religious grounds, Pistole didn't waiver: "While we respect that person's beliefs, that person's not going to get on an airplane."



In March, the TSA introduced AIT scanners -- also known as "nude body" or "whole body' scanners -- and now uses them in more than 60 airports, including South Florida airports: Six each at Palm Beach International and Miami International and 10 at Hollywood- Fort Lauderdale.



The machines project a black and white image of a passenger's naked body to a screen in a separate, private room where it is studied by a TSA agent.



No face is visible and the agent never sees the person being scanned.



TSA officials say the new technology is necessary because it detects not just metal but other potentially dangerous materials, including plastic explosives.



Koshetz said the TSA goal is for as many passengers as possible to pass through the AIT machines, rather than the less revealing traditional metal detectors.



A recent CBS poll found that 81 percent of people questioned did not object to the AIT system. But some do and an online group called National Opt-Out Day is encouraging passengers to refuse the AIT screening on Wednesday, the day before Thanksgiving, which would force TSA to perform many more manual searches and probably cause long delays.



They may be letting themselves in for more than they expect. A policy enacted in the past month allows agents to perform manual searches of passengers, including their private areas, which are much more invasive than the back-of-the-hand technique most often used in the past. Some critics have referred to the technique as "groping."



One critic of the TSA is Jon Corbett, 26, of Miami Beach, who this week requested that a U.S. District Court judge in Miami grant an injunction to block the new security methods. Corbett said he plans to fly to New York Thanksgiving Day and had hopes the court would respond before that.



"But I'm not sure that will happen," he said.


Copyright © 2010, South Florida Sun-Sentinel





Related storiesAround the Web

Sarah Palin to Air Security Agents: ’Profile Away’
politicsdaily.com

Thanksgiving travelers grumble over airport security
chicagobreakingnews.com

E-mail Print Digg Twitter Facebook StumbleUpon Share

Comments (453)Add / View comments
Discussion FAQ

Red Rocha at 1:47 AM November 21, 2010

As pertaining to thr 4th Amendment, I think this applies:







www.sinpaid.com

cjauregui10 at 1:35 AM November 21, 2010

See here's this issue. If you're facing a $11,OOO fine, why bother???? Stay home!!!! Economically it's makes no sense to proceed.

allforjo-jo at 11:41 PM November 20, 2010

BILL OF RIGHTS!!:















THIS ONE:



Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.





The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.







THIS ONE:



Fifth Amendment – due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, eminent domain.





No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.