from The Patriot Word:
Monday, August 30, 2010SCOTUS Committing Federal Crime When They Use "Incorporation"
“Incorporation” Practiced by the Supreme Court is a Federal Crime:
The SCOTUS has incorporated the 1st Amendment onto the states, and recently used incorporation to justify overturning Chicago's and Washington DC's handgun bans.
It would be laughable that the United States Supreme Court thinks that they need to or have the power to incorporate any clause of the Constitution onto the states, if it weren’t such a serious violation of federal criminal law. In addition to be a pointless exercise it is also a criminal activity.
Incorporation is the extension of laws beyond their legal scope, and is not a power granted to our judiciary. The effect of incorporating any part of the Constitution or Federal Law onto the states is to either usurp the Legislative Power of Congress, or to circumvent the Article V procedure for amending the constitution.
Exercising such illegal authority is an oath of office violation, punishable under federal criminal statutes. Overturning laws that contravene the Constitution does not require Incorporation, and is provided for by the Supremacy Clause (Article 6).
Members of the Supreme Court are required to take an oath before assuming office, in which, the member swears to uphold, protect, or defend the constitution and do equal justice under it.
They also sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331, stating that they have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office. 5 U.S.C. 7311 explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”.
The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.
The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”
Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.
The Supreme Court doesn’t need “incorporation” to do their job, it’s unconstitutional, illegal and a violation of federal criminal law. When they encounter laws that are unconstitutional, they have the authority to strike them down, they have no authority whatsoever to “incorporate” or force any government to accept a law they favor.
Posted by Walter L. Brown Jr. at 9:53 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment